Middle East

Wednesday, 12 March 2008 19:00 Michael Skinner Editorial Dept - Middle East
Print

The Afghanistan Canada Research Group was formed in 2006 by a group of York University graduate students concerned with the Canadian Mission in Afghanistan.

The focus of our work over the past two years was to document Afghan opinions of the international intervention in Afghanistan.

In June and July of 2007, I spent five weeks travelling in Afghanistan with another researcher Hamayon Rastgar. Based out of Kabul, we travelled to Bamiyan and Yawkawlang in the central region of Afghanistan, north into Parwan province, and as far south as the city of Ghazni. During Hamayon’s three month visit, he travelled further north to Mazar-e-Sharif and Konduz and as far south as Kandahar City. 


The purpose of our visit was to ask ordinary Afghans – particularly workers and students who do not have a voice in either the international or Afghan media – what they think about the international military intervention in their homeland.
 

 
Tuesday, 11 March 2008 19:00 Sungur Savran Editorial Dept - Middle East
Print

 The February incursion of the Turkish army into northern Iraq has ended in a terrible debacle for both U.S. imperialism and Turkey.

The two allies are at loggerheads once again, after the thaw in their relations achieved at the White House talks between Bush and Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan on 5 November 2007. The Turkish government and the army are the object of unprecedented criticism by the bourgeois media and also by ordinary people.

And, to add insult to injury for the USA, only three days after the withdrawal of Turkish troops from northern Iraq on February 29, a triumphant Mahmoud Ahmedinejad, the President of Iran, was shown on television screens around the world in Baghdad, presumably all smiles for having achieved the feat of being the first Iranian president to visit Iraq under U.S. occupation, 29 years after the Islamic revolution and 20 years of the deadly war between the two countries.

 

 
Thursday, 17 January 2008 19:00 Yacov Ben Efrat Editorial Dept - Middle East
Print

After returning from the Annapolis Conference, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert told Haaretz (November 28, 2007) that "the State of Israel cannot endure unless a Palestinian state comes into being."

Olmert had made a like pronouncement in December 2003, when he was Deputy Prime Minister to Ariel Sharon. At that time he told Nahum Barnea of Yediot Aharonot: "Israel will soon need to make a strategic recognition… We are nearing the point where more and more Palestinians will say: 'We're persuaded. We agree with [right-wing politician Avigdor] Lieberman. There isn't room for two states between the Jordan and the sea. All we want is the right to vote.' On the day they reach that point," said Olmert, "we lose everything. … I quake to think that leading the fight against us will be liberal Jewish groups that led the fight against apartheid in South Africa."

On hearing these words, Barnea rubbed his eyes in astonishment. Today, it would appear, the message is no less relevant. In Olmert's appraisal, if no solution is found to the Palestinian question, Israel will wind up with an apartheid regime; the Palestinians of the Occupied Territories will then demand the right to vote. The democratic West, he knows, will not forever tolerate an ethnocracy that withholds this right from a third or more of its subjects. Such is the Zionist nightmare.
 

 
Tuesday, 01 January 2008 19:00 Linda Averill Editorial Dept - Middle East
Print

Palestinian immigrants thwart 20-year effort by U.S. to deport them for their radical views

On Oct. 31, 2007, the LA 8 scored a hard-earned and long sought victory for the First Amendment rights of immigrants when the Board of Immigration Appeals dropped all deportation proceedings against Khader Hamide and Michel Shehadeh.

The decision marks the end of a 20-year ordeal for the two men, who are both originally from the West Bank but have lived in the U.S. their entire adult lives as permanent residents and raised families here.

Hamide and Shehadeh are part of a group of seven Palestinians and one Kenyan, who were originally rounded up in Los Angeles in 1987, thrown into a maximum security prison for three weeks, and then threatened with deportation because of their political activism and advocacy for Palestinian statehood.

 

 
Wednesday, 26 December 2007 19:00 Sharif Hikmat Nashashibi and Guy Gabriel Editorial Dept - Middle East
Print

Every now and then, particularly around Christmas, the odd commentator in the British press attempts to deny Israel's responsibility for the demise of Bethlehem and the suffering of its residents, blaming the Palestinians themselves and the media's supposedly inherent desire to demonise Israel. This year, one such person is Michael Gove, a columnist for The Times, writing in the newspaper on 11 December 2007 under the headline "Bethlehem and bigtory."

"The truth is very different," claims Gove, adding that the "parlous position of Palestinian Christians…is a consequence not of Israeli aggression," and that "Israel goes out of its way to honour sites and traditions sacred to other faiths."

He is either woefully ignorant of the situation, or wilfully deceiving his readers. Either way, it is evident that he has neither the knowledge nor authority to speak for Bethlehem's residents or Palestinian Christians, who would vehemently disagree with him. As such, AMW recommends that Gove and his ilk visit Bethlehem, speak to Palestinian Christians, and brush up on relevant, authoritative human rights reports. 

 

 
Saturday, 24 November 2007 15:40 Roni Ben Efrat Editorial Dept - Middle East
Print

Marking the third anniversary of Yasser Arafat's death, Fatah's big show of power on the streets of Gaza (November 12, 2007) drew an extremely violent reaction from Hamas. Its security forces killed seven demonstrators and wounded sixty or more. It was the first major Fatah rally since the Hamas coup in June of this year.

With about 200,000 participants, it took many by surprise: who would have thought that there were still so many Fatah adherents in Gaza? What brought them into the streets, no doubt, was the image of Arafat, symbol of the lost and longed-for Palestinian consensus. But no one imagined that Hamas would react so hysterically. The disproportionate response shows the pressure it is under.

Part of that pressure stems from the Annapolis Conference, set for November 26. Hamas will be a present absentee. Absent in the flesh, it will be strongly present as an obstacle.

The idea for the conference began as an American attempt to blur the debacle in Iraq by presenting a show of progress on the Israeli-Palestinian front. Such a conference would have been impossible before the schism between Fatah and Hamas. The split freed President Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen) from any need to please the Islamists. The unbinding, however, cost him authority. Gaza is lost. In the West Bank he remains a weak reed. The disconnection from Hamas is now the first great impediment for him or anyone seeking to end the conflict.

 

 

Page 7 of 10

<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Translator

Share GFP

Share with friends!

Follow the GFP

You are here:   The FrontPageEditorial TopicsWorld PoliticsMiddle East